I’m not a cheater (not a conscious one, anyway) but in 3rd edition, I often forgot to keep strict track of the duration of Haste, Rage and similar effects. My group tracked these durations by keeping a d6 face turned to the number of rounds remaining. Often a turn would go by… or three… and it wouldn’t occur to anyone to decrement the die. We’d finish a grueling battle and the Haste counter would still be turned accusingly to 6.

If I had a negative condition on me (blind for 4 turns, for instance), it was a different story. When I took an attack, I’d think about my blindness and about how I wanted to get rid of it, and I would decrement that die.

In the stark watches of the night, the time when, traditionally, good men must come to grips with their ethical failings as D&D players, I tell myself that I’m no more dishonest than other players; it is my subconscious that is a cheater. I think this is a universal human trait.
Read the rest of this entry »

There were some long-overdue updates in the latest 4e errata. Here are my two favorites:

Daggermaster’s Action
Page 127: Replace the class feature with the following text: “When you use a rogue or a daggermaster attack power with a dagger, the power can score a critical hit on a roll of 18–20.” This change updates the feature to reflect the original intent.

I’ve definitely been guilty of exploiting the non-rogue daggermaster loophole (critical hits for all!!). It’s really fun to get crits, and so Daggermaster is a tempting option with a lot of classes and builds. I never sunk quite low enough to play the daggermaster sorcerer, but my daggermaster monk, Bolo, will miss critting on an 18-20 with his burst 1 at-will attack. At level 11 he crit every few turns, and he did something like 9d10 bonus damage. This takes a long time to roll if you don’t have extra d10s from your history of White Wolf gaming. Bolo was the second-most annoying character I ever played, after my 3.5 factotum who made a trip attack and a followup melee attack on every. single. turn.

The reduction in scope of Daggermaster will mean that when picking a paragon path, I no longer have to feel like either a rules-exploiting villain or a non-optimized fool.

Aid Another: The creature makes a skill check or an ability check with a DC equal to 10 + one-half the creature’s level.

The 10 DC For Aid Another was inexplicable. It was a weird holdover from 3e, and I have no idea how it survived this long. A 10 DC meant that it was reasonably challenging for unskilled level 1 characters; grew less fearsome as they got to around level 3; and by Paragon level, was basically unfailable. I’m all for different tiers feeling different, but I don’t think “occasional failure to help with a difficult task” needs to be a defining quality of low-level play.

I also note with pleasure that the DC of the check is 10 + 1/2 level, which is the pattern that I’ve been using for all skill checks, instead of the crazy, unlearnable, errata’ed chart. I don’t use a DM screen, and I need reasonable DCs I can calculate in my head whenever players try a skill, which is often. I’m actually hoping for an errata to the errata that will use 10, 15, 20 + 1/2 level for all skills DCs.

Also, there is now a -1 penalty for failing the Aid Another check! This was the other thing Aid Another needed to make it a non-bogus rule. 4e seems to be evolving into my houseruled version of 4e.

(Actually, I do use a DM screen: a first-edition screen our game host has had since childhood. So I’m set in case I need to know an assassination success percentage.)

I’d written up ideas for levelling up magic items, Weapons of Legacy-style, for 4th edition, but I see that Jeff Rients beat me to the punch by a day or two. His implementation is not specifically for 4th edition, but he expresses some of the same concerns I do about previous attempts (Weapons of Legacy, etc) and both our ideas involve the concept of “awakening” the item. Parallel evolution, I swear!

Jeff says: “First start out by assuming that any magic weapon found in play with just a bonus (i.e. a plain ordinary sword +1, axe+2, etc.) is a dormant weapon.” This is the assumption behind my houserule too, although I descend further into absurdity: every item is dormant, even if it already has a special property.

The things from Jeff’s article I wish I’d thought of are a) the importance of names for magic items and b) illustrating your rules with example characters who don’t make it through the example alive. Not since the sample dungeon adventure in the 1st edition DMG, where the halfling is paralyzed and forced to watch as ghouls eat his innards, has there been such an example-character bloodbath. This has a salutary effect on other example characters, I think.

So here are my rules:
Read the rest of this entry »

If you DM, you probably have a world map, or at least a continent map or local area map. However, I bet you haven’t made a map of the Feywild!

The Feywild is supposed to be an analogue of the natural world, so you could reasonably take an outline of your world map, color everything green for Forest, and dot it with some cool feywild locations. As an alternative, though, what about using something like this for your Feywild map?

“The Prince’s Quest: A Fairy Race Game” is a boardgame from 1890. It seems to play a bit like Candyland. It is probably not great as a game, but it has nice Victorian fairy art and some interesting locations that could be turned into strange encounters: for instance 28. The Talking Dog, 10. The Goblin Gate or 185. Malachite Bridge.

It seems thematic that the Feywild is all about following permissible paths, not about travelling freely in any direction. You can’t really map Fairyland: it resists definition, and directions and distances may be mutable anyway. The way to get somewhere is not to follow a map but to follow instructions: “Follow the setting sun until you get to the Glass Hill, then throw a straw in the air and travel in the direction it points, until you reach the Oracle, who…” etc.

You could either make the players play the game to travel, or just let them travel their speed along the paths.

The gameboard is sold as wrapping paper for $4 from Kate’s Paperie, which is how I got it: around a birthday present.

Wizards has a new thing out, Monster Slayers, which is marketed as D&D For Kids!

Really, “D&D For Kids” is like “Jobs For Adults” or “Pince-Nez for Affected Fops!” D&D is already for kids, or was when I was a kid. But I see what they mean. It’s D&D for kids too young for D&D!

It’s an interesting take on D&D: a 14-page PDF, of which about 2 pages are rules, and the rest are monsters, pregenerated characters, an adventure, props and art. The adventure is supposed to take 30 minutes. Imagine running a D&D adventure in 30 minutes! This would be awesome. You could play D&D during lunch hour at work! You could play D&D 8 times in the time it usually takes to play once!

It’s interesting to look at a stripped-down D&D ruleset, especially in light of my earlier thoughts about what I thought was essential to D&D at age 8. D&D gets overcomplicated sometimes. It might be valuable to strip out a bunch of rules and see which ones you miss.

Here’s some notable D&Disms not found in Heroes of Hesiod:
Read the rest of this entry »

So a simple idea I’m trying out for my most recent d&d campaign is as follows:

1. Every player has a public goal, which is one of the big reasons they’re traveling with the party. It’s either in the party’s best interest to pursue the goal or the goal is appropriately noble. Example: Create a center of learning that will draw people from throughout the land!

2. Every player also has a private goal, something that is probably secret and that they don’t really need the group’s help to accomplish. In fact, such a goal might even run contrary to the group’s goals. Example: Become a God!

3. The players are all united by a few principle goals that I set before them (assuming they care about them at all). Example: Discover the mystery as to why the  the boundaries between the planes are breaking down.

4. Because I’ve been really annoyed in the past at having to separate in game knowledge from out of game knowledge I’m instituting a rule where if some piece of information comes out at the gaming table, anyone can invent a reason why they might have figured it out. This is a little silly, but is my best guess for how to actually preserve a sense of intrigue at the table. So if someone is about to have an important conversation, I ask them if they want to have it in another room away from earshot of other players. And people are encouraged to slip me notes and the like.

5. Players all have quests and minor quests associated with their goals (which give XP to the entire group, naturally). Thus, mechanical reasons to pursue your goals!

The main goal is to encourage rich interwoven storytelling where what might seem like a straightforward adventure like exploring a cool tower actually has several layers of subtext. Plus it’s fun in D&D to have a personal sense of accomplishment that goes beyond the mechanical benefits of leveling up and the mundane satisfaction of saving the world yet again!

“The Lightning Thief” struck me as a natural translation of Harry Potter: teen, troubled in the real world, finds his inner, hereditary potential at a school for… fighters!

I just saw a preview for “The Sorcerer’s Apprentice”. Looks, on the surface, like the same thing, but with a ranged striker, complete with Chaos Bolt.

I’d like to see the Leader version. Whose superpower fantasy is of being the party cleric?