druids of the forgotten kingdoms

September 12th, 2010

Page 31 of Heroes of the Fallen Lands lists the classes that will be covered in this book – fighter, cleric, rogue, and wizard – but since we’ll cover these in more detail when we get to those chapters, I won’t linger on them now. Page 32, however, lists the classes and builds that will be available in Heroes of the Forgotten Kingdoms. This is practically an engraved invitation for us to speculate with insufficient data!

Druid, sentinel (leader): In past editions, druids had healing abilities as well as grabby-vines controller abilities, so I guess it’s nice that druids get a Leader build. I am interested to see how they avoid the CoDzilla problems of 3e, where clerics and druids could fill many party roles.

The Essentials druid is undoubtedly what Mma Ramotswe would call a “traditionally built” class, by which I mean a class with a regular pre-Essentials schedule of encounter and daily powers. Presumably these powers will all be interchangeable with druid powers from the PHB2 controller druid. What’s to stop a druid from cherrypicking both controller powers and leader powers?

Really, that’s the potential problem with any class which can cover different party roles. A good deal of a class’s ability to perform its role comes from class features. Many powers, however, bolster that role. For instance, imagine a defender class that had free access to cleric powers: sure, he wouldn’t have the Healing Word feature, but he’d have access to Recovery Strike, Healing Strike, and Beacon of Hope, and that’s just at level 1. He might be able to do a decent job in two roles.

On the other hand, covering multiple rolls with one class could be a good way to simulate multiclassing, while keeping the flavor of one unified class. So I could be a slayer (striker fighter) who takes some fighter utilities that help me mark an opponent, allowing me shoulder the role of defender from time to time, which is already a secondary role for my build.

More Essentials thoughts…

tricked!

September 11th, 2010

Do you like fantasy fiction featuring dwarves or elves? Try building a character of one of those races. Do you want your character to be the toughest adventurer at the table? Consider a class like fighter or paladin.

This passage from Player’s Handbook was copied almost without change into Heroes of the Fallen Lands, which is weird because in HotFL, you can’t actually play a paladin.

More Essentials thoughts…

Example of play

September 11th, 2010

Page 17 of HotFL has an “Example of Play”: pretty much the same one in the 4e PHB, except that there are mysterious differences.

The names have been changed: The DM is now named Chris and not Dave, and the other player and character names have changed as well. There are a few additions, too. I’ll quote it (keeping the old names) and bold the new text.
Read the rest of this entry »

never send a halfling to do a man’s job

September 11th, 2010

Heroes of the Fallen Lands

Heroes of the Fallen Lands

Heroes of the Fallen Lands‘s cover illustration, by Ralph Horsley, is of a fairly typical scenario – two adventurers fighting undead while their muttonchopped halfling sidekick freaks out and fails to help. The adventurers are in a dungeon.

Somehow, the image’s irregular border fools my eye into thinking it’s a more interesting setting. My brain reads the dungeon wall as a Great Wall of China-style outside wall, with a white sky above it. The two adventurers are standing before a gate, holding off undead. I imagine the walls continuing for thousands of miles in either direction, protecting – the Fallen Lands? – from a continent’s worth of undead. Now that’s a setting!

Oh, so here’s a difference between the PHB and HotFL. The PHB subtitle is “Arcane, Divine and Martial Heroes”. The HotFL’s is “Create and Play Clerics, Fighters, Rogues, and Wizards!” The HotFL subtitle has a certain something that the PHB subtitle lacks. And that certain something is an exclamation point!

More Essentials thoughts…

trade paperback manuals

September 11th, 2010

It’s surprisingly strange to hold a D&D book as small as Heroes of the Fallen Lands. I’ve been reading multicolumn D&D books – either hardcover or magazine size – for more than 20 years. My brain can barely cope with the lack of an alley between columns. And there seem to be so few words per page! What would fit on one column of the PHB takes up a page of a trade paperback.

I am surprised that this makes such a difference to me. If I like large-format books so much, the logical extension is to print books on the largest possible pieces of paper – perhaps the PHB 1 should have been printed on pages the size of a foldable poster map. It’d take about thirty-five of them.

More Essentials thoughts…

heroes of the fallen lands liveblog

September 11th, 2010

Heroes of the Fallen Lands

Heroes of the Fallen Lands

I just planned to buy Heroes of the Fallen Lands this weekend, but so much Essentials stuff was on sale at my FLGS that I suffered a brief bout of Essentials Fever. Do I need the Rules Compendium, or are my existing books and the errata enough? I’ve never used Dungeon Tiles, but maybe they’re cool? …but are they Essentially cool? DO I NEED THE DICE? ARE THE DICE ESSENTIAL?

I walked out of the store with only “Heroes of the Fallen Lands”. And a used copy of a Gary Gygax novel, “The Samarkand Solution”. Unless there is a surprising groundswell of interest in the latter, I will liveblog only “Heroes of the Fallen Lands”.

Regrets? I have a few. Should I go back and get the dice? If I do, how can I liveblog them?

More Essentials thoughts…

your job is to hit things!

September 10th, 2010

Oops… somehow during our Red Box liveblog, we wrote a post about the Essentials fighter and never published it! Might as well post it now…

On my first time through Essentials character creation, I’m playing a fighter. A green-skinned fighter with rainbow hair. In my first combat, I learn about standard, move, and minor actions, hit rolls, defenses, and damage rolls (not that damage matters, because my opponents are minions). I’m also told about my fighter stances, Poised Assault and Battle Fury. The game tells me that in this case, I really should use Poised Assault. And that’s the end of the tactical thinking. The fighter path is the simplest of the paths. There are no tactical or power decisions to make. However, the fighter path has one difference from the other three classes: it’s possible to die.

The Wizard, Rogue and Cleric paths last a few rounds, max, so you’re guaranteed to win before you can possibly accumulate enough damage to die. The fighter, though, keeps on exchanging attacks with his goblin minion opponent until one of them dies. The goblin minion’s chances of victory are slim, but they are there: D&D joins Space Opera and Traveller as games in which a character can die during character creation.

Note that if you are reduced to 0 HP, you don’t technically die, you “lose consciousness”. You don’t wake up, though: you start the CYOA over, just as if you had died. The unconsciousness/death text-block admonishes you to “make sure you are using all the right numbers for your attack bonus and defenses”, because, honestly, you died against a minion?

To be fair, you probably wouldn’t die, since presumably the other members of the party are around to help you maybe! And you’d have to fail THREE saving throws before someone came around and made a DC 10 heal check to trigger your second wind and bring you back into the fight. And it would be a cruel DM who would have the goblin minion repeatedly coup de grace you to kill you before you’ve even really started playing the game. That would take 3 coup de graces!

I do like that they deal with the possibility of going unconscious, especially since they explain that going unconscious isn’t the same as dying and dying isn’t even necessarily permanent!

So Essentials: Heroes of the Fallen Lands should be available at some stores tomorrow! If I can pick one up, I might live-blog it if I get it. Check out blogofholding.com over the weekend.

More Red Box thoughts…

Ravenloft took my NADs

September 9th, 2010

The Ravenloft board game uses stripped-down D&D 4e rules, which means that, as far as I’m concerned, it’s auditioning to become the real D&D rules. I think each piece of the whole baroque structure of D&D should be examined for freshness daily.

Notably absent from Ravenloft are the Non AC Defenses (NADs): Reflex, Fortitude, and Will. Every Ravenloft attack targets AC. I gotta tell you… I didn’t miss my NADs.

Reflex, Fortitude, and Will saving throws, introduced in 3e, were a huge advance from the saving throws of 1e and 2e. 4e further improved the system by having the attacker, not the defender, roll the d20. I think the next big improvement – maybe in 5e – might be to eliminate the whole subsystem. Whaa? Paul, you’re crazy! I know, right?
Read the rest of this entry »

Thirdhand science says: Randomize your treasure!

September 8th, 2010

Laura Redcloud’s review of “How We Decide” gives me some (pseudo?)science to justify something I already believe:* random game rewards are more fun.

[W]e get pleasure when our (subconscious) expectations of reward are met, and we feel upset when those expectations are dashed. Additionally, we get extra dopamine when the reward is surprising. So, what we like, from most to least:

-2 Surprising disappointment
-1 Predictable disappointment
+1 Predictable confirmation of expectations
+2 Surprising confirmation of expectations

1e D&D is a hulking eldritch megabeast born from a mad wizard’s experimental combination of surprising rewards and surprising punishments.

4e repudiated randomness for sanity, balance, and survivability. On the whole, 4e is stronger for it.

Treasure, though, is an area where randomness should reign.
Read the rest of this entry »

problems with monster HP: prove me wrong! or right!

September 7th, 2010

This morning I claimed that monsters gain too many HP per level, based on the fact that a) PC damage increases by 1 point per attack, and b) the design intent is that monsters be killed by 4 attacks.

Check my math! I said that a reasonable average damage for level-30 at-wills is 38 HP (or slightly more for a striker). Can you guys make me some builds? (Remember, these are all-around decent character builds, not optimized-for-damage builds.) The rules are: you choose a class, an at-will power, an attribute arrangement of your choice, and no more than 4 feats and 2 magic items.